
Salt, Sea Devil ambassador: “These are the words of a politician, vetted and craven and hollow. You would answer.”
Barclay, Ambassador for human-kind: “Because we were stupid. That’s the truth of it. And the whole planet is going to hell right now because we didn’t understand the consequences.”
Salt, Sea Devil ambassador: “But now, you do?”
Barclay, Ambassador for human-kind: “Yeah, now we do. Still every day water companies are pumping poison and sewage into our rivers and oceans, all the while dishing out bonuses to their bosses. And the thing is, we are letting them get away with it! We’re just sat at home, flicking through our phones, making tea, thinking it’s someone else’s problem! But it’s not. This is my fault. We all played our part. Now we have to help fix it. And the thing is, our kids know this! Our kids. They’re way ahead of us! Why aren’t we listening? Well, today’s the day we start.”
Salt, Sea Devil ambassador: “I think you are my favourite human.”
_____________________________________________________________________________
This exchange from the new BBC/Disney+ series The War Between the Land and the Sea stayed with me long after the episode finished. The sets, costumes and visuals are impressive — but it was Barclay, the unlikely ambassador thrust into responsibility, who delivers the most piercing truth:
“And the thing is, we are letting them get away with it!”
“Why aren’t we listening?”
Two lines that feel painfully relevant.
Water companies, oil and gas giants, the media, the banks, and the politicians who prop them up have been getting away with it for decades — and we’ve let them.
Where am I going with this?
This post is about why we must accelerate the transition to renewable energy, whilst also bringing essential services like water back into public ownership. For decades, executives have prioritised profit, bonuses and shareholders over public good. Since privatisation in 1989, it’s been yet another “victory” for neoliberal capitalism — one that has spectacularly screwed us over.
We’ve Been Betrayed
The science on greenhouse gases has been clear for almost two centuries.
- In 1824, Joseph Fourier described the greenhouse effect.
- In 1861, John Tyndall identified the gases responsible. The Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research — named after Tyndall — is just down the road from me in Norwich.
- In 1900, Knut Angstrom, discovers CO2 strongly absorbs parts of the infrared spectrum.
- In 1938, Guy Callendar showed that temperatures rose over the previous century. He demonstrated that CO2 concentrations had increased over the same period, and suggested this caused the warming. His claims were dismissed.
- In 1968, US President’s Advisory Committee panel warned that the greenhouse effect is a matter of “real concern”.
- In 1975, scientist Wallace Broecker put the term “global warming” into the public domain.
The above has been followed by countless IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) assessments, and COPs (Conference of the Parties) to try to solve the challenge of climate breakdown. Some progress has been made, but not nearly enough.
We’ve known the facts. We’ve proven them. And yet oil and gas companies hid their own research, just as tobacco companies once hid the link between smoking and cancer. Billionaire-owned media outlets are defending them. Politicians were and are being lobbied into paralysis – just look at COP30. And so we are being lied to, misdirected and exploited whilst the planet is burning.
We have been failed time and time again by successive Governments who have put the interests of mega-corporations, profit and power, ahead of ordinary people. They have betrayed us to the altar of profit, lied, misdirected, and in some cases filled their pockets with blood money.
We didn’t “fail to understand” — we are being denied the truth.
We’re Not Stupid
Barclay says, “Because we were stupid.”
But we weren’t. We were and are being deliberately misled.
Instead of honesty, we got greenwashing, smokescreens, and faux responsibility — like BP inventing the personal carbon footprint calculator to shift the blame from corporations onto individuals.
Imagine if the public could be given the same clarity scientists shared recently at the National Emergency Briefing. The shift in understanding — and action — might come rapidly and radically.
National Emergency Briefing – https://www.nebriefing.org/
You can find recordings of the various segments of the National Emergency Briefing on YouTube.
How Fast Can We Decarbonise?
In the UK, we’ve reduced emissions — but we still emit far more per person than many countries with less wealth and fewer resources. And we should have made the major cuts twenty years ago. We’re now out of time for a gentle transition. We must act rapidly, even if it’s uncomfortable.
This will upset people, especially in a country used to convenience and abundance. But climate physics does not negotiate. Deaths, harm, migration, are all being caused right now by our carbon emissions.
Our Obligations
We are privileged — often without realising it. Given our historic emissions, the UK has a moral obligation to move first and fast.
The alternative? Pull up the drawbridge, protect ourselves for a few extra years, and ignore suffering elsewhere. But our food imports, supply chains and future mass migration make that fantasy laughable.
Billions will be on the move. The question is whether we meet that future prepared — or panicked.
Tell the Truth
People are not being told the truth by politicians or the media. If they were, they’d understand what we are facing:
As laid out at the National Emergency Briefing, the collapse of AMOC (the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation – a crucial system of Atlantic Ocean currents acting as a giant conveyor belt) could mean:
- –30°C winters
- extreme summer heat
- chronic water shortages
- the UK unable to grow food
- the British becoming climate refugees
The irony isn’t lost on me; one wonders whether we’ll have enough small boats.
Extinction Rebellion warned we needed major emissions cuts in 2018. Oil and gas companies and wealthy governments around the world denied it, buried it, or have since waved around Carbon Capture and Storage — a technology unproven at meaningful scale, and one that conveniently ignores the huge emissions from extraction and transport of natural gas in the first place. Profit over life, again.
So, What Can We Do?
We need rapid, large-scale deployment of renewables:
- Wind
- Solar
- Tidal
- Geothermal – there’s some exciting stuff going on with old coal mines
Fusion power would be ideal, but remains underfunded and decades away. We also need to upgrade the grid and to build massive battery storage facilities. This is all doable and exciting, and will create huge potential in terms of sustainable economic growth, jobs and wellbeing, we just need the politicians in power to stop dragging their heels.
But there are obstacles. Solar is a prime example.
Solar Energy: What’s The Problem?
Rooftop solar is brilliant — low impact, popular, and efficient. But we no longer have the luxury of time. Large solar farms are faster to deliver and much cheaper per megawatt.
Using ChatGPT for initial comparisons (yes, with a pinch of salt but it saves me hours of trawling through websites and research papers), I asked, when looking at the electricity 4,000 acres solar panels could generate, what is cheaper and quicker to build – a large solar farm or rooftop mounted solar:
Large Solar Farms
- 400MW: ~£400–600m plus land/grid costs
- 800MW: ~£800m–1.2bn
- Build time: 12–24 months after permitting
Distributed Rooftop Solar
- 400MW: ~£600–800m (likely more)
- 800MW: ~£1.2bn–1.6bn+
- Rollout time: 5–10+ years
Planning times for solar farms could be slashed if government finally treated the climate emergency like an emergency.
And then there’s capitalism: energy companies don’t want millions of small producers cutting into profits. Legislation could fix this — but it requires political will. We already know neoliberal capitalism needs serious reform.
As for the criticism that solar farms use agricultural land:
- They would occupy only 0.45%–0.82% of agricultural land, some of which is fallow at the moment anyway.
- We already face food insecurity. Solar barely dents agriculture.
- Meanwhile, golf courses consume five times more land than solar would — and I know which I’d rather repurpose.
You can’t tee off on a golf course that’s underwater.
Unfortunately, there is significant opposition to solar farms, largely from people living near proposed sites — which is understandable
Grid Upgrades: The Unavoidable Backbone
We need new pylons, underground cables, or subsea routes — plus battery storage. None of this is optional, and the arguments are similar to the above. All options have ecological impacts, but we’re out of time for perfect solutions.
Pylons may be ugly, but they’re cheaper, faster, and even capable of creating wildlife corridors. France has even turned some into public art. If only imagination were a UK policy priority.
Large Scale Renewables Are the Clear Winner
Solar farms and other renewable energy sources are the clear winner if our priority is rapid decarbonisation. They are cheaper, quicker to build, will create new jobs and provide clean energy. They are our future proofing.
We face a choice: continue failing, continue betraying younger generations, retreat into selfishness and isolation—or respond to the climate and ecological emergencies with the urgency they demand, adopting something akin to a wartime mobilisation.
It may already be too late to avoid severe impacts. But every fraction of a degree of avoided warming saves lives, ecosystems and stability.
CO₂ rises → temperature rises → runaway climate impacts:
- floods, fires, drought, famine, harvest failure, extreme weather, mass migration, ocean collapse, extinction events… and then societal collapse.
The stakes could not be higher.
The Path Ahead
We change — or we face the consequences.
The graph below shows how CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere have changed over the millennia, using data from ice core samples.

Renewables give us a fighting chance of reducing emissions and avoiding societal collapse. Oil, gas and nuclear leave only waste and devastation. Renewables can coexist with nature and even help restore it when designed well.
It comes down to communicating honestly, successive governments, oil and gas companies, supported and controlled by billionaire media magnates, have denied people that honesty: change now, or our children will not live to the same age we do.
We don’t have to let them make us stupid, but they won’t change on their own.
We have to force it.
Let’s Take Back Power
From billionaires. From fossil fuel companies. From media moguls. From corrupted politicians who may not even realise how compromised they are. Let’s stop them getting away with it.
They’ve been getting away with it for decades. They are “craven and hollow.”
We can stop them.
And yes — I’m going to say it:
Vote Green. Let’s make hope normal again
Promoted by James Harvey on behalf of Broadland Green Party, a constituent party of the Green Party of England & Wales PO Box 78066, London, SE16 9GQ







































































